Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: exynosautov920: Fix incorrect CLKS_NR_CPUCL0 definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:35:16PM GMT, Shin Son wrote:
> The CLKS_NR_CPUCL0 macro was incorrectly defined based on a wrong clock ID.
> It mistakenly referenced CLK_DOUT_CLUSTER0_PERIPHCLK, which corresponds to
> a cluster peripheral clock, not the last clock ID for CPUCL0 as intended.
> 
> This patch corrects the definition to use CLK_DOUT_CPUCL0_NOCP + 1,

Please do not use "This commit/patch/change", but imperative mood. See
longer explanation here:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95	

> properly matching the last clock ID for CPUCL0 as intended.
> 
> This error was due to confusion with the hardware diagram, and this patch
> ensures that the number of clocks for CPUCL0 is correctly defined.

Fixes: 59636ec89c2c ("clk: samsung: exynosautov920: add cpucl0 clock support")


And proper order - fixes are *ALWAYS* before new features.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux