Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 at 13:49, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:07:50PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> > As per Exynos5422 user manual e-Fuse range min~max range is 16~76.
> > if e-Fuse value is out of this range, then thermal sensor may not
> > sense thermal data properly. Refactors the efuse value
> > initialization logic within exynos_map_dt_data function by
> > replacing the nested if-else statements with a switch statement.
> > Ensures proper initialization of efuse values based on the SOC type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Same subject typo: s/exymos/exynos/
Thanks for your review comments.
Opps, I will fix this next version it got skipped.
>
> > ---
> > v5: None
> > v4: None
> > v3: Improve the logic to convert if/else to switch
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > index ac3b9d2c900c..a71cde0a4b17 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > @@ -899,12 +899,23 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > data->gain = 8;
> > data->reference_voltage = 16;
> > data->efuse_value = 55;
> > - if (data->soc != SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420 &&
> > - data->soc != SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO)
> > + data->max_efuse_value = 100;
> > + switch (data->soc) {
> > + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS3250:
> > + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412:
> > + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5250:
> > + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260:
> > data->min_efuse_value = 40;
> > - else
> > + break;
> > + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420:
> > + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO:
> > + data->min_efuse_value = 16;
> > + data->max_efuse_value = 76;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > data->min_efuse_value = 0;
> > - data->max_efuse_value = 100;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > break;
> > case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433:
> > data->tmu_set_low_temp = exynos5433_tmu_set_low_temp;
>
> Thanks for taking care of cleaning up this portion of code. IMO, it would be
> interesting to go a bit further in the house keeping by replacing this big
> switch with a set of structures stored as __init sections. The initialization
> finds the right structure and does a structure copy to 'data'.
>
> It is up to you to do this change or not.
I'll be sure to check this out.
Thanks
-Anand
>
> --
>
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
