On Sun, 2025-04-06 at 20:33 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > You just sorted the MFD headers in other patch, but here you break the > sorting. > > For me patches resorting the addresses (as a separate patch) is churn, > but sure. If you do this however, it means you really believe that it is > worth to sort them, so you must keep that standard for all your further > patches in that series. Definitely. Not sure how that happened :-( > > Rest is fine, so with this fixed: > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Krzysztof! Cheers, Andre'
