Re: [PATCH 16/19] perf: Introduce positive capability for sampling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025-08-26 2:11 pm, Leo Yan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:01:08PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
Sampling is inherently a feature for CPU PMUs, given that the thing
to be sampled is a CPU context. These days, we have many more
uncore/system PMUs than CPU PMUs, so it no longer makes much sense to
assume sampling support by default and force the ever-growing majority
of drivers to opt out of it (or erroneously fail to). Instead, let's
introduce a positive opt-in capability that's more obvious and easier to
maintain.

[...]

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index 369e77ad5f13..dbd52851f5c6 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -955,7 +955,8 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_perf_init(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu)
  	spe_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
  		.module = THIS_MODULE,
  		.parent		= &spe_pmu->pdev->dev,
-		.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE | PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE,
+		.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING |
+				  PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE | PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE,
  		.attr_groups	= arm_spe_pmu_attr_groups,
  		/*
  		 * We hitch a ride on the software context here, so that

The change in Arm SPE driver looks good to me.

I noticed you did not set the flag for other AUX events, like Arm
CoreSight, Intel PT and bts. The drivers locate in:

   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
   arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c
   arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c

Genearlly, AUX events generate interrupts based on AUX ring buffer
watermark but not the period. Seems to me, it is correct to set the
PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING flag for them.

This cap is given to drivers which handle event->attr.sample_period and call perf_event_overflow() - or in a few rare cases, perf_output_sample() directly - to do something meaningful with it, since the intent is to convey "I properly handle events for which is_sampling_event() is true". My understanding is that aux events are something else entirely, but I'm happy to be corrected.

Otherwise, perhaps this suggests it deserves to be named a little more specifically for clarity, maybe PERF_CAP_SAMPLING_EVENTS?

Thanks,
Robin.

A special case is Arm CoreSight legacy sinks (like ETR/ETB, etc)
don't has interrupt. We might need set or clear the flag on the fly
based on sink type:

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
index f1551c08ecb2..404edc94c198 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
@@ -433,6 +433,11 @@ static void *etm_setup_aux(struct perf_event *event, void **pages,
         if (!sink)
                 goto err;
+ if (coresight_is_percpu_sink(sink))
+               event->pmu.capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING;
+       else
+               event->pmu.capabilities &= ~PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING;
+

Thanks,
Leo





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux