Re: [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()
From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:02:02 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>, kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>, Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, wireguard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1d74a0e2-51ff-462f-8f3c-75639fd21221@lucifer.local>
References: <20250827220141.262669-1-david@redhat.com> <20250827220141.262669-16-david@redhat.com> <1d74a0e2-51ff-462f-8f3c-75639fd21221@lucifer.local>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 28.08.25 17:45, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:

On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:19AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:

The nth_page() is not really required anymore, so let's remove it.
While at it, cleanup and simplify the code a bit.


Hm Not sure which bit is the cleanup? Was there meant to be more here or?


Thanks, leftover from the pre-split of this patch!

--
Cheers

David / dhildenb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()
  - From: Lorenzo Stoakes

References:
- [PATCH v1 00/36] mm: remove nth_page()
  - From: David Hildenbrand
- [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()
  - From: David Hildenbrand
- Re: [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()
  - From: Lorenzo Stoakes

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 13/36] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 13/36] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]