Re: [PATCH 08/16] mm: add remap_pfn_range_prepare(), remap_pfn_range_complete()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 02:27:12PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:

> It's not only remap that is a concern here, people do all kinds of weird
> and wonderful things in .mmap(), sometimes in combination with remap.

So it should really not be split this way, complete is a badly name
prepopulate and it should only fill the PTEs, which shouldn't need
more locking.

The only example in this series didn't actually need to hold the lock.

Jason




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux