Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic with PREEMPT_RT=y and bpf selftests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025-06-05 08:48:38 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu,  5 Jun 2025 11:19:03 +0200
> Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch seems to create so much output that the orginal error message and
> > backtrace often get lost, so I needed several runs to get a meaningful message
> > when running
> 
> Are you familiar with preempt count tracing?

I have an initial set of patches to tackle this problem, I'm going to
send them after the merge window.

Sebastian




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux