Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic with PREEMPT_RT=y and bpf selftests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025-05-25 18:32:28 [-0700], Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:48 PM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > [ T2916]  rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x635/0x1d00
> > [ T2916]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> > [ T2916]  ? lock_acquire+0xca/0x300
> > [ T2916]  rt_spin_lock+0x99/0x190
> > [ T2916]  task_get_cgroup1+0xe8/0x340
> > [ T2916]  bpf_task_get_cgroup1+0xe/0x20
> 
> Known issue.
> Please trim your emails.

This is the trace thingy. Let me take a look.

Sebastian





[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux