On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:56 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -637,20 +638,21 @@ static void *timerthread(void *param)
> sigset_t sigset;
> timer_t timer;
> struct timespec now, next, interval, stop = { 0 };
> struct itimerval itimer;
> struct itimerspec tspec;
> struct thread_stat *stat = par->stats;
> int stopped = 0;
> cpu_set_t mask;
> pthread_t thread;
> unsigned long smi_now, smi_old = 0;
> + unsigned long skip_cycles = skip_sec * USEC_PER_SEC / par->interval;
>
BTW, I noticed this is not the best approach: in case cycles take
longer than the interval, we may be skipping longer than the
parameter. Will send a rfc v2 for taking time into account instead of
cycles.
Thanks!
Leo
