Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:27:52 +0100
Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Mar 2025 11:49:24 +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> > 
> > This is a resubmission of Mark's patch [1]. I didn't end up changing anything
> > other than fluffing up the changelog.
> > 
> > I ran this under an arm64 VM, added some trace_printk's and checked that
> > sched_switch's between runnable hackbench threads would occurr in the right
> > conditions:
> > o with TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY set
> >   o at the tick
> >   o at do_notify_resume()
> > o with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set
> > 
> > [...]  
> 
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/entry), thanks!
> 
> [1/1] arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY
>       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/c8597e2dd8b6

Great news. Thank you!

Petr T




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux