> On 23 Jul 2025, at 13:11, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed Jul 23, 2025 at 6:07 PM CEST, Daniel Almeida wrote: >> On top of that, we can use the >> words "interior mutability" somewhere in the example as well to make it even >> clearer. > > You *can* have this example and I encourage it, I think it is valuable. You can > have spinlock or mutex for this purpose in threaded handler, no? Right, but then what goes in the hard-irq part for ThreadedHandler? I guess we can leave that one blank then and only touch the data from the threaded part. If that’s the case, then I think it can work too. — Daniel
