On 7/15/25 12:36 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:54:48AM GMT, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 7/14/25 8:01 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> It allows us to group all the settings that need to be done when a PCI
>>> device is attached to the bus in a single place.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>> index b4993642ed90915299e825e47d282b8175a78346..b364977d78a2c659f65f0f12ce4274601d20eaa6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>> @@ -1616,8 +1616,6 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_pcie_global_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
>>> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
>>> pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
>>> pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
>>> -
>>> - qcom_pcie_icc_opp_update(pcie);
>>> } else {
>>> dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, 1, "Received unknown event. INT_STATUS: 0x%08x\n",
>>> status);
>>> @@ -1765,6 +1763,7 @@ static int pcie_qcom_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
>>> switch (action) {
>>> case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
>>> qcom_pcie_enable_aspm(pdev);
>>> + qcom_pcie_icc_opp_update(pcie);
>>
>> So I assume that we're not exactly going to do much with the device if
>> there isn't a driver for it, but I have concerns that since the link
>> would already be established(?), the icc vote may be too low, especially
>> if the user uses something funky like UIO
>>
>
> Hmm, that's a good point. Not enabling ASPM wouldn't have much consequence, but
> not updating OPP would be.
>
> Let me think of other ways to call these two APIs during the device addition. If
> there are no sane ways, I'll drop *this* patch.
Would it be too naive to assume BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE is a good fit? Do
ASPM setting need to be reapplied after the PCIe device is reset? (well
I would assume there are probably multiple levels of "reset" :/)
Konrad
