On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 1:31 PM Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 1:17 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 10:25:51PM -0500, Aaron Kling via B4 Relay wrote: > > > > You should always add the context of the series in the cover letter. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes in v6: > > > - Remove unused debugfs cleanup function, as caught by kernel ci > > > - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250505-pci-tegra-module-v5-0-827aaac998ba@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > - Copy commit message exactly word for word on patch 1, as required by reviewer > > > - Delete remove callback in patch 3, per request > > > - Don't clean up debugfs, per request, which drops patch 4 entirely > > > - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250505-pci-tegra-module-v4-0-088b552c4b1a@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Changes in v4: > > > - Updated commit messages for patches 1 and 2, per review > > > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502-pci-tegra-module-v3-0-556a49732d70@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - Add patch to drop remove callback, per request > > > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-pci-tegra-module-v2-0-c11a4b912446@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > - Add patch to export tegra_cpuidle_pcie_irqs_in_use as required when > > > building pci-tegra as a module for arm > > > - Drop module exit to prevent module unloading, as requested > > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250420-pci-tegra-module-v1-0-c0a1f831354a@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > --- > > > Aaron Kling (3): > > > irqdomain: Export irq_domain_free_irqs > > > cpuidle: tegra: Export tegra_cpuidle_pcie_irqs_in_use > > > > I need an ACK from the cpuidle maintainers to take these 3 patches through PCI > > tree. > > Reminder about this series. I'm normally interacting with the tegra > maintainers, but I don't particularly care which tree it goes through > as long as something that works gets merged. So, can one of the > cpuidle maintainers take a quick look through this, please? > > Aaron There's been no responses here for a month. If no cpuidle maintainers wish to respond, then what? It makes more sense to me to take this through the tegra tree. But Thierry had concerns about removing functionality that was confirmed working. Manivannan, if this was to go through the tegra tree, would you still block this conversion if it didn't drop the unplug/unload functionality? There's many existing drivers, including one for newer tegra archs, that are unloadable modules that would be affected by the IRQ concern. I don't want to cause friction here, but I do want to get this merged before the next LTS, so I can use it for my projects. Aaron
