On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:38:48PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -1826,8 +1826,8 @@ static inline int pcie_set_target_speed(struct pci_dev *port, > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM > int pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); > int pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); > -int pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); AFAICT there's no caller of this at all. Why do we keep it? > -int pci_enable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); We only have two callers of this (pcie-qcom.c and vmd.c, both in drivers/pci/), so it's not clear to me that it needs to be in include/linux/pci.h. I'm a little dubious about it in the first place since I don't think drivers should be enabling ASPM states on their own, but pcie-qcom.c and vmd.c are PCIe controller drivers, not PCI device drivers, so I guess we can live with them for now. IMO the "someday" goal should be that we get rid of aspm_policy and enable all the available power saving states by default. We have sysfs knobs that administrators can use if necessary, and drivers or quirks can disable states if they need to work around hardware defects. I think the compiled-in aspm_policy default and the module parameters are basically chicken switches that only exist because aspm.c and some devices aren't robust enough. Bjorn
