On Fri Jul 11, 2025 at 1:22 AM CEST, Alistair Popple wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote: >> On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 4:24 AM CEST, Alistair Popple wrote: >> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/pci.rs b/rust/kernel/pci.rs >> > index 8435f8132e38..5c35a66a5251 100644 >> > --- a/rust/kernel/pci.rs >> > +++ b/rust/kernel/pci.rs >> > @@ -371,14 +371,18 @@ fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut bindings::pci_dev { >> > >> > impl Device { >> > /// Returns the PCI vendor ID. >> > + #[inline] >> > pub fn vendor_id(&self) -> u16 { >> > - // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`. >> > + // SAFETY: by its type invariant `self.as_raw` is always a valid pointer to a >> >> s/by its type invariant/by the type invariants of `Self`,/ >> s/always// >> >> Also, which invariant does this refer to? The only one that I can see >> is: >> >> /// A [`Device`] instance represents a valid `struct device` created by the C portion of the kernel. > > Actually isn't that wrong? Shouldn't that read for "a valid `struct pci_dev`"? Yes, and it's fixed in the driver-core tree already. :)