On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 11:11:02 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:55:17AM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 06:34:00PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [...] > > > We could use MSInRx_HWIRQ_MASK, I can update it. > > > > More importantly, what code would set data->hwirq[6:4] (and > > data->hwirq[7:7] below) ? > > Forget it. It is the hwirq allocation itself that sets those bits, > 256 HWIRQs you use the effective cpu affinity to steer the frame, > it makes sense now. Exactly. > > I can update the code to use the mask above and merge it. > > Sorry for the noise, No worries, and thanks for looking at it! M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
