On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 00:51:24 +0200 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Since it touched several subsystems and it is based on rust-next, I am >> happy to do so, but driver-core makes sense given that is the main >> change after all. >> >> So if I don't see you picking it, I will eventually do it. > > Checked again and the driver-core tree makes most sense, since we also need to > fix up the ACPI device ID code, which is queued up in driver-core-next. > > I also caught a missing change in rust/kernel/driver.rs, which most likely > slipped through by not building with CONFIG_OF. :) Oops, you are right. I mistakenly thought that CONFIG_OF was enabled because kernel/of.rs was being compiled. > Here's the diff to fix up both, I already fixed it up on my end -- no need to > send a new version. Thanks a lot!
