Accessing cpu_online_mask here is problematic because the cpus read lock
is not held in this context.
However, cpu_online_mask isn't needed here since the effective affinity
mask is guaranteed to be valid in this callback. So, just use
cpumask_first() to get the cpu instead of ANDing it with cpus_online_mask
unnecessarily.
Fixes: e39397d1fd68 ("x86/hyperv: implement an MSI domain for root partition")
Reported-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hyperv/SN6PR02MB4157639630F8AD2D8FD8F52FD475A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
index 31f0d29cbc5e..e28c317ac9e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
@@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ static void hv_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
struct pci_dev *dev;
struct hv_interrupt_entry out_entry, *stored_entry;
struct irq_cfg *cfg = irqd_cfg(data);
- const cpumask_t *affinity;
int cpu;
u64 status;
@@ -204,8 +203,7 @@ static void hv_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
return;
}
- affinity = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data);
- cpu = cpumask_first_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_first(irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data));
if (data->chip_data) {
/*
--
2.34.1
