On Sun Jun 22, 2025 at 6:40 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> +impl<T: Release> Release for crate::sync::ArcBorrow<'_, T> {
> + fn release(&self) {
> + self.deref().release();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +impl<T: Release> Release for Pin<&'_ T> {
You don't need the `'_` here.
> + fn release(&self) {
> + self.deref().release();
> + }
> +}
I still think we're missing a `impl<T: Release> Release for &T`.
And maybe a closure design is better, depending on how much code is
usually run in `release`, if it's a lot, then we should use the trait
design. If it's only 1-5 lines, then a closure would also be fine. I
don't have a strong preference, but if it's mostly one liners, then
closures would be better.
If you keep the trait design & we resolve the `&T: Release` question:
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Cheers,
Benno
