On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 7:44 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Independent from that, won't this potentially leave us with a lot of warnings > from code that goes through other trees in the upcoming merge window? How do we > deal with that? Yeah, good question. Since they are Clippy ones, it should not be a big deal (e.g. we already had a case of a lint Clippy lingering for a long time due to timing of merge window etc. in the QR code). In this case, I didn't see new ones in -next yet when I looked, so it should be mostly fine I think. It is also why I asked Tamir to re-send it at the beginning of the cycle, and then a v12 to include a few newer parts that were missed that landed lately. So, worst case, they get fixed during the -rcs. But, yeah, a while ago I proposed to have -rc1 to -rc2 as "treewide cleanups time" -- it would make this sort of things (that is not fully automated, but close) easy. Cheers, Miguel
