On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:28:40 -0400 Yury Norov wrote: > > > And perhaps that (and more potential users) could persuade Jakub that > > > this is not that weird after all? > > > > I will operate under the assumption that Jakub's opinion will not change > > as he ignored the commit message that talks about multiple vendors, > > ignored the cover letter that talks about multiple vendors, and ignored > > my e-mail where I once again made it clear to him that it's multiple > > vendors, and still claims it's a Rockchip specific convention. > > As far as I understood, he concerns not about number of drivers that > opencode HIWORD_UPDATE(), but that this macro is not generic enough > to live in bitfield.h. And it's a valid concern - I doubt it will > be helpful somewhere in core and arch files. Exactly.
