On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:06:59PM +0900, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote: > Hello, > > > PolarFire SoC may be configured in a way that requires non-coherent DMA > > handling. On RISC-V, buses are coherent by default & the dma-noncoherent > > property is required to denote buses or devices that are non-coherent. > > For some reason, instead of adding dma-noncoherent to the binding > > the pointless, NOP, property dma-coherent was. Swap dma-coherent for > > dma-noncoherent. > > I have favour to ask. Can you capitalise (so-called "title case") the > subject when submitting patches that are PCI-specific DT bindings? Sure, I can add that to my list of things I try to remember while submitting for PCI. > > This is the preferred style for PCI, at least at the moment. > > Also, it would save us the need to do it every time. :) > > Thank you! > > Krzysztof
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
