> The audio IP in Wildcat Lake (WCL) is largely identical to the one in > Panther Lake, the main difference is the number of DSP cores, memory > and clocking. > It is based on the same ACE3 architecture. > > In SOF the PTL topologies can be re-used for WCL to reduce duplication > of code and topology files. Is this really true? I thought topology files are precisely the place where a specific pipeline is assigned to a specific core. If the number of cores is lower, then a PTL topology could fail when used on a WCL DSP, no?
