On Wed, May 07 2025 at 09:53, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 03:30:28PM +0800, Zijiang Huang wrote: > The question is, why did the commit only replace raw_spin_lock() > with pci_lock_config() in the in-kernel PCI accessors, but not in > the user space accessors? Is it safe to replace it there as well? See comment above pci_cfg_access_lock() ...