The commit a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to
pci_bus_lock()") made the lock function to call depend on
dev->subordinate but left pci_slot_unlock() unmodified creating locking
asymmetry compared with pci_slot_lock().
Because of the asymmetric lock handling, the same bridge device is
unlocked twice. First pci_bus_unlock() unlocks bus->self and then
pci_slot_unlock() will unconditionally unlock the same bridge device.
Move pci_dev_unlock() inside an else branch to match the logic in
pci_slot_lock().
Fixes: a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- Improve changelog (Lukas)
- Added Cc stable
drivers/pci/pci.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 4d7c9f64ea24..26507aa906d7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -5542,7 +5542,8 @@ static void pci_slot_unlock(struct pci_slot *slot)
continue;
if (dev->subordinate)
pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
- pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+ else
+ pci_dev_unlock(dev);
}
}
base-commit: 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8
--
2.39.5
