Hi Thomas, Andrew, On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:48:09 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 17:03:45 +0200 > Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So it only supports a single .dtbo. In its current form it does not > > scale to multiple .dtso files for multiple different boards built > > around the PCIe chip. > > > > At the moment, that is not really an issue, but when the second board > > comes along, some refactoring will be needed. > > Indeed, but that's really an implementation detail. It doesn't change > anything to the overall approach. The only thing that would have to > change is how the driver gets the .dtbo. We could bundle several .dtbos > in the driver, we could fall back to request_firmware(), etc. > Not sure we need to split right now the existing dtso file nor rename it even if it is updated in the series. This could be done later when an other user of the LAN996x PCI chip is there. Doing something right now will probably need other modification when this potential other user comes in. Indeed, depending on specificities of this future user, what is done now could not match the need of this future user. Any opinion? Best regards, Hervé
