Hello, [...] > > > > So I guess without this patch, we incorrectly ignore link-down > > > > interrupts on J784S4. It's good to have a one-sentence motivation > > > > like that somewhere in the commit log that we can pull out and include > > > > in the merge commit log and the pull request. > > > > > > Yes, we can prepend the following to the existing commit message: > > > "Link down interrupts on J784S4 SoC are missed because..." > > > > > > resulting in the following updated paragraph in the commit message: > > > Link down interrupts on J784S4 SoC are missed because commit under Fixes > > > assigned the value of 'linkdown_irq_regfield' for the.... > > > > How does this look like? > > > > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/j721e&id=b97b5b8cb603a4ba6b3f7f1b6065fa76e69bdb56 > > > > Let me know if you want any changes. > > I will suggest minor changes to the first paragraph of the commit > message resulting in the following paragraph: > > Commit under Fixes assigned the value of .linkdown_irq_regfield for the > J784S4 SoC as the "LINK_DOWN" macro corresponding to BIT(1), and as a > result, the Link Down interrupts on J784S4 SoC are missed. OK. Updated. We are going to meet there half-way. :) Thank you! Krzysztof
