Re: [PATCH] PCI/AER: Consolidate CXL and native AER reporting paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:56:16PM +0100, Karolina Stolarek wrote:
> On 20/03/2025 19:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Maybe there's CXL magic that I missed.  It looks like Terry's series
> > changes some of this path.  And GHES also currently uses
> > pci_print_aer().

> ... But still, the question is if going with the
> new format that matches what's in AER a bad or disruptive thing. I'd like to
> try going in the direction of using one way of reporting AER errors, if
> possible.

Absolutely, I agree 100%.  The choice between native AER and GHES is
made by the platform, not by the OS, so I think it's crazy that we log
them differently.  We just need to include information about any log
format changes we make to help users adapt to them.

Bjorn




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux