On 6/13/25 7:12 AM, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> On 11 Jun 2025, at 15:46, Nikhil Jha via B4 Relay wrote:
>
>> From: Nikhil Jha <njha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> There was a silly bug in the initial implementation where a loop
>> variable was not incremented. This commit increments the loop variable.
>>
>> This bug is somewhat tricky to catch because it can only happen on loops
>> of two or more. If it is hit, it locks up a kernel thread in an infinite
>> loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Jha <njha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Nikhil Jha <njha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fixes: 08d6ee6d8a10 ("sunrpc: implement rfc2203 rpcsec_gss seqnum cache")
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks! I've applied this bugfix to my linux-next, and I'll send a pull request
with it before v6.16-final.
Anna>
> Ben
>
