On 12 Jun 2025, at 3:22, kernel test robot wrote: > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed a 41.2% regression of stress-ng.msg.ops_per_sec on: Wow, this is really unexpected here - best I can think is that we're mucking up cachelines in a very problematic way, but then NFS would have to be involved in the test somehow and I don't see evidence of that. LKP folks, is there some NFS on the test system that could be in play? I see that you collect nfsstat output, but I don't see that output in the details. Is it possible this report could be an anomaly? Ben
