Also, wearing my pragmatic practitioner's hat, since the Linux knfsd does not do a CB_RECALL now and has shipped this way to who knows how many users, declaring that it must be CB_RECALL'd does not seem useful? rick > >> (I don't think it is, but there is a discussion in 18.25.4 which says >> "When the determination above cannot be made definitively because >> delegations are being held, they MUST be recalled.." but everything >> above that is a may/MAY, so it is not obvious to me if a server really >> needs to case?) > > > This should be more clear. Will be looking at a possible change in the next rfc5661bis draft. >> >> >> Any comments? Thanks, rick >> ps: I am amazed when I learn these things about NFSv4.n after all >> these years. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nfsv4 mailing list -- nfsv4@xxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to nfsv4-leave@xxxxxxxx
