On 6/5/25 12:54 PM, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > On 5 Jun 2025, at 10:26, Chuck Lever wrote: > >> This doesn't apply to v6.16-rc1 due to recent changes to use a >> dynamically-allocated rq_pages array. This array is allocated in >> svc_init_buffer(); the array allocation has to remain. > > Well, shucks. I guess I should be paying better attention. > > Can we drop the bulk allocation in svc_init_buffer if we're just going to > try it more robustly in svc_alloc_arg? Maybe! I would like to understand the failure a little better. Why is mount susceptible to this issue? -- Chuck Lever
