On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 15:25 +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
> When memory is insufficient, the allocation of nfs_lock_context in
> nfs_get_lock_context() fails and returns -ENOMEM. If we mistakenly treat
> an nfs4_unlockdata structure (whose l_ctx member has been set to -ENOMEM)
> as valid and proceed to execute rpc_run_task(), this will trigger a NULL
> pointer dereference in nfs4_locku_prepare. For example:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000000c
> PGD 0 P4D 0
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u64:0 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc2-dirty #60
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40
> Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule
> RIP: 0010:nfs4_locku_prepare+0x35/0xc2
> Code: 89 f2 48 89 fd 48 c7 c7 68 69 ef b5 53 48 8b 8e 90 00 00 00 48 89 f3
> RSP: 0018:ffffbbafc006bdb8 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 000000000000004b RBX: ffff9b964fc1fa00 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: fffffffffffffff4 RDI: ffff9ba53fddbf40
> RBP: ffff9ba539934000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffbbafc006bc38
> R10: ffffffffb6b689c8 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff9ba539934030
> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000004248060 R15: ffffffffb56d1c30
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ba5881f0000(0000) knlGS:00000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000000000000000c CR3: 000000093f244000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __rpc_execute+0xbc/0x480
> rpc_async_schedule+0x2f/0x40
> process_one_work+0x232/0x5d0
> worker_thread+0x1da/0x3d0
> ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> kthread+0x10d/0x240
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
> Modules linked in:
> CR2: 000000000000000c
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> Free the allocated nfs4_unlockdata when nfs_get_lock_context() fails and
> return NULL to terminate subsequent rpc_run_task, preventing NULL pointer
> dereference.
>
> Fixes: f30cb757f680 ("NFS: Always wait for I/O completion before unlock")
> Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 970f28dbf253..9f5689c43a50 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -7074,10 +7074,18 @@ static struct nfs4_unlockdata *nfs4_alloc_unlockdata(struct file_lock *fl,
> struct nfs4_unlockdata *p;
> struct nfs4_state *state = lsp->ls_state;
> struct inode *inode = state->inode;
> + struct nfs_lock_context *l_ctx;
>
> p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (p == NULL)
> return NULL;
> + l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(ctx);
> + if (!IS_ERR(l_ctx)) {
> + p->l_ctx = l_ctx;
> + } else {
> + kfree(p);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> p->arg.fh = NFS_FH(inode);
> p->arg.fl = &p->fl;
> p->arg.seqid = seqid;
> @@ -7085,7 +7093,6 @@ static struct nfs4_unlockdata *nfs4_alloc_unlockdata(struct file_lock *fl,
> p->lsp = lsp;
> /* Ensure we don't close file until we're done freeing locks! */
> p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx);
Not exactly the same problem, but get_nfs_open_context() can fail too.
Does it need error handling for that as well?
> - p->l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(ctx);
> locks_init_lock(&p->fl);
> locks_copy_lock(&p->fl, fl);
> p->server = NFS_SERVER(inode);
Good catch:
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
