On 3/31/25 9:05 AM, Lionel Cons wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 20:13, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 3/25/25 2:50 PM, Lionel Cons wrote: >>> Does kernel.org have a bot (syzbot?) doing NFSv4.1 RDMA testing as part of CI? >>> >>> My feeling is that the current NFSv4.1 RDMA support is under-tested, >>> and needs better test coverage. >> >> I run tests nightly. What makes you think there are testing gaps? > > Because we're stuck with a Linux 5.x kernel, and so far every > quick&dirty attempt to jump to Linux 6.6 LTS or 6.12 LTS resulted in a > half or non-functional RDMA or pNFS. I encourage you to report the details of the issues. There is nothing we can do about bugs or testing gaps if we don't know there is a problem. As I said, my nightly QA runs include NFS/RDMA on v4.1 with siw on virtio net, and I run these tests on LTS 6.6, 6.12, and 6.13 in addition to pre-release upstream kernels. (I also test the other LTS kernels, but not with NFS/RDMA). My lab is based on ConnectX-5 IB and RoCE cards where I do my primary development work, on NFS/RDMA mounts. I know Red Hat has NFS/RDMA testing, but perhaps other distributions do not. Not sure. -- Chuck Lever
