On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:34, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 10:43 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
>> There are certain users that wish to force the NFS client to choose
>> READDIRPLUS over READDIR for a particular mount. Update the
>> "rdirplus" mount
>> option to optionally accept values. For "rdirplus=force", the NFS
>> client
>> will always attempt to use READDDIRPLUS. The setting of
>> "rdirplus=none" is
>> aliased to the existing "nordirplus".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/dir.c | 2 ++
>> fs/nfs/fs_context.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> fs/nfs/super.c | 1 +
>> include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
>> index 2b04038b0e40..c9de0e474cf5 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
>> @@ -666,6 +666,8 @@ static bool nfs_use_readdirplus(struct inode
>> *dir, struct dir_context *ctx,
>> {
>> if (!nfs_server_capable(dir, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS))
>> return false;
>> + if (NFS_SERVER(dir)->flags && NFS_MOUNT_FORCE_RDIRPLUS)
>
> Bitwise and?
Oh crap - my tests are junk.
Ben
