"Darin Morrison" <darinmorrison@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Showcase the rust module parameter support by adding a module parameter to
>> the `rust_minimal` sample.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>> diff --git a/samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs b/samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs
>> index 1fc7a1be6b6d..8eb9583571d7 100644
>> --- a/samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs
>> +++ b/samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs
>> @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
>> authors: ["Rust for Linux Contributors"],
>> description: "Rust minimal sample",
>> license: "GPL",
>> + params: {
>> + test_parameter: i64 {
>> + default: 1,
>> + description: "This parameter has a default of 1",
>> + },
>> + },
>
> Thanks for the patches.
>
> I've been using these in a new PCI device driver module and noticed
> that the inclusion of `params:` in the rustdoc test here causes the
> `rusttest` target to fail with a linker error (below) complaining about
> undefined references for `rust_helper_atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed` and
> `rust_helper_atomic_set_release`.
>
> Building a real module and using the `params:` field seems to work
> fine though so it must be something specific to the test configuration.
>
> Any ideas how to fix this?
Thanks for reporting! I don't have that issue locally. Do you have a
tree and a config you can point me to, so I can try to reproduce?
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
