On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:37 PM Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@xxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Petr, > If I understand the cover letter and its linked discussion correctly, > the aim is to eventually move users to unbound workqueues unless they > really need to use per-CPU workqueues. Yes, correct. This first round is just a 1:1 conversion keeping the old behavior. But later yes, the aim is to let per-cpu just who needs to be per-cpu. > The two work items queued by the dups.c code can run anywhere. I don't > see a reason why they need to be bound to a specific CPU. > If it helps, I believe you can already update this code to use the new > system_dfl_wq. Cool, I will send the v2 converting directly from system_wq to system_dfl_wq. Thank you! -- Marco Crivellari L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx
