On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Christoph suggested that the explicit _GPL_ can be dropped from the > module namespace export macro, as it's intended for in-tree modules > only. It would be possible to resrict it technically, but it was pointed s/resrict/restrict/ > out [2] that some cases of using an out-of-tree build of an in-tree > module with the same name are legitimate. But in that case those also > have to be GPL anyway so it's unnecessary to spell it out. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aFleJN_fE-RbSoFD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [1] > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK7LNATRkZHwJGpojCnvdiaoDnP%2BaeUXgdey5sb_8muzdWTMkA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2] > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@xxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> > --- Looks good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@xxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
