"Benno Lossin" <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue Jul 8, 2025 at 3:06 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote: >> "Benno Lossin" <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> On Mon Jul 7, 2025 at 3:29 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote: >>>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync.rs b/rust/kernel/sync.rs >>>> index 81e3a806e57e2..13e6bc7fa87ac 100644 >>>> --- a/rust/kernel/sync.rs >>>> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync.rs >>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ >>>> mod locked_by; >>>> pub mod poll; >>>> pub mod rcu; >>>> +mod set_once; >>> >>> I would have named this `once`. >> >> So module `once` and struct `SetOnce`? Struct name `Once` would lead >> thoughts to `std::sync::Once`, which is a different thing. > > Hmm I thought that `Once` and `SetOnce` would live in the same module, > but if they don't then I think it's better to keep the `set_once` > module as-is. I guess they could live together. I was thinking a module for each. We can always move it, the module name is not part of a public API. Let's go with `set_once` for now and we can change it later, if we decide it is for the better? Best regards, Andreas Hindborg
