"Benno Lossin" <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri Jul 4, 2025 at 9:37 AM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 7/2/25 3:18 PM, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>>>> + /// Get a shared reference to the parameter value.
>>>>> + // Note: When sysfs access to parameters are enabled, we have to pass in a
>>>>> + // held lock guard here.
>>>>> + pub fn get(&self) -> &T {
>>>>> + self.value.as_ref().unwrap_or(&self.default)
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> I think you forgot to rename this.
>>>
>>> Yes, thanks for being persistent on this :)
>>
>> Actually, there is a discussion on whether to keep the API similar to
>> `std::sync::OnceLock` [1] but also whether to rename this to something
>> other than `OnceLock` [2]. Depending on how that resolves, it might make
>> sense to stay with `get` or rename to something else.
>
> But this is for the `ModuleParamAccess`, right? There I think it makes
> sense to choose `access` or `value`.
Right, sorry. My context window was too small here.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
