Re: [PATCH v2] params: Add support for static keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:34:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> > > @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct kparam_array
> > >   *	charp: a character pointer
> > >   *	bool: a bool, values 0/1, y/n, Y/N.
> > >   *	invbool: the above, only sense-reversed (N = true).
> > > + *	static_key_t: same as bool, but updates a 'struct static_key'
> > 
> > The static_key_*() interfaces are deprecated because they're really easy
> > to use incorrectly.  I don't think we want to propagate that misuse to
> > modules.
> > 
> > It would be better to have type(s) based on static_key_false and/or
> > static_key_true, depending on whatever the default is.
> 
> Except those are just wrappers around struct static_key, so why does
> that matter here?

Those struct wrappers are needed to work with static_branch_likely() and
static_branch_unlikely().

We really need to get rid of old static_key_true() and
static_key_false(), they don't have many users left at this point.

-- 
Josh




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux