Hi Petr,
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 5:17 AM Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/30/25 23:40, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > +static void type_parse(const char *name, const char *str,
> > + struct type_expansion *type)
> > +{
> > + char *fragment;
> > + size_t start = 0;
> > + size_t end;
> > + size_t pos;
> > +
> > + if (!*str)
> > + error("empty type string override for '%s'", name);
> > +
> > + type_expansion_init(type);
> > +
> > + for (pos = 1; str[pos]; ++pos) {
> > + bool empty;
> > + char marker = ' ';
> > +
> > + if (!is_type_prefix(&str[pos - 1]))
> > + continue;
[...]
>
> I'd find this mini-parser more straightforward, if its main loop started at
> pos=0 and looked ahead, instead of starting at pos=1 and looking behind.
True, I'll send v2 with this changed. Thanks for taking a look!
Sami
