On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:11:09AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "freq" variable is in terms of MHz and "max_val_cycles" is in terms
> of Hz. The fact that "max_val_cycles" is a u64 suggests that support
> for high frequency is intended but the "freq_khz * 1000" would overflow
> the u32 type if we went above 4GHz. Use unsigned long long type for the
> mutliplication to prevent that.
>
> Fixes: 31c128b66e5b ("net/mlx4_en: Choose time-stamping shift value according to HW frequency")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
