On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 10:26:42AM -0500, Jeff LaBundy wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 06:00:46PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > > > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 07:20:22PM -0500, Jeff LaBundy wrote: > > > If a proximity event node is defined so as to specify the wake-up > > > properties of the touch surface, the proximity event interrupt is > > > enabled unconditionally. This may result in unwanted interrupts. > > > > > > Solve this problem by enabling the interrupt only if the event is > > > mapped to a key or switch code. > > > > Should I tag this for stable? > > Thank you for checking; I'm sorry for the delayed response. Yes, I > think it's fine to tag this for stable. > > I didn't CC stable@ originally because I saw this patch as more of > an optimization than a bug fix, but it's low risk enough that it's > fine to include in stable kernels too. Applied, thank you. -- Dmitry
