[PATCH RFC 26/35] mspro_block: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a
single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage.

Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
index c9853d887d282..985cfca3f6944 100644
--- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
+++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
@@ -560,8 +560,7 @@ static int h_mspro_block_transfer_data(struct memstick_dev *card,
 		t_offset += msb->current_page * msb->page_size;
 
 		sg_set_page(&t_sg,
-			    nth_page(sg_page(&(msb->req_sg[msb->current_seg])),
-				     t_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT),
+			    sg_page(&(msb->req_sg[msb->current_seg])) + t_offset / PAGE_SIZE,
 			    msb->page_size, offset_in_page(t_offset));
 
 		memstick_init_req_sg(*mrq, msb->data_dir == READ
-- 
2.50.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux