On 5/6/25 04:38, Ioannis Barkas wrote: > Hello Mikko, thanks for sharing all those details, we have some > additional information on this. You did not do a reply-all... > > I am suspicious with hw and not with you. A quirk will affect lots of > devices and we need to be sure that we have examined the error you get > so that there is no need to revert things. FYI, I have a disk with a > quirk for no obvious reason on all hosts because nForce had NCQ > trouble with it. If a quirk gets applied usually it stays for a long > time if not forever. > > Back to your case, on first look I can see that disks are in mint > condition and are running the default fw, 82.00A82. Damien is there a > newer version available? I need to disk serial numbers for checking that but Mikko redacted it. Mikko, Please send me the serial numbers of your disks. You can send that privately to me. Thanks. > Please run a short test to each one to ensure that everything is OK > after working for 10K+ hours and share their health log again. It is > clear that both go south at the same time so RAID array dies as > expected following that initial event. You just leave the PC on and > then you get that event on both? > > Supposing you get no error at disks after all that but still disks go > offline, I would suggest to update your board fw to version 3621 and > retest. The controller-disk combo should work fine. Just to clarify > things, upon turning off LPM, you get no error at all? > > Except the short form of lspci, let's get the fulll dump for SATA > controller to see its active PCI settings with: > sudo lspci -nnnnvvvvxxxxks 01:00.1 > > You can get it before touching anything and then with 3621 fw if you > update your board. This will pinpoint if anything has been modified > between different fw releases. > > If the problem remains no matter what, a quirk is inevitable. Do we > wish to block LPM on Intel hosts while no one has reported errors? How > about a new quirk called ATA_QUIRK_NO_LPM_ON_AMD500 for 500 series ICs > or ATA_QUIRK_NO_LPM_ON_AMD similar to ATA_QUIRK_NO_LPM_ON_ATI blocking > LPM for ATI chips? > > Best regards, > Ioannis > -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
