On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:40:03 +0100 Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 07:49:27AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@xxxxxxx> > > > > liburcu doesn't have kfree_rcu (or anything similar). Despite that, we can > > hack around it in a trivial fashion, by adding a wrapper. > > > > This wrapper only works for maple_nodes, and not anything else (due to us > > not being able to know rcu_head offsets in any way), and thus we take > > advantage of the type checking to avoid future silent breakage. > > > > This fixes the build for the VMA userland tests. > > > > Additionally remove the existing implementation in maple.c, and have > > maple.c include the maple-shared.c header. > > > > Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Andrew - please attribute this as Pedro's patch (Pedro - please mail to > > confirm), as this is simply an updated version of [0], pulled out to fix the > > VMA tests which remain broken. > > > > ACK, this is fine. The future of the series is still unclear, so if this fixes > the build then all good from my end :) Well, can we have this as a standalone thing, rather than as a modification to a patch whose future is uncertain? Then we can just drop "testing/radix-tree/maple: hack around kfree_rcu not existing", yes? Some expansion of "fixes the build for the VMA userland tests" would be helpful.
