On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 10:49:48AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote on Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 11:55:20AM -0500: > > >> I was able to test this to some degree, but I am not sure how to test > > >> all transports; there may well be bugs here. It would be great to get > > >> some feedback on whether this approach seems reasonable, and of course > > >> any further review or testing would be most welcome. > > > > > > I still want to de-dust my test setup with rdma over siw for lack of > > > supported hardware, so I'll try to give it a try, but don't necessarily > > > wait for me as I don't know when that'll be.. > > > > Any news on testing? :) > > Thanks for the prompting, that's the kind of things I never get around > to if not reminded... > > I got this to run with a fedora-based host (unlike debian siw is > built-in): > > - host side > ``` > $ sudo modprobe siw > $ sudo rdma link add siw0 type siw netdev br0 > (sanity check) > $ ibv_devices > device node GUID > ------ ---------------- > siw0 020000fffe000001 > ( https://github.com/chaos/diod build) > $ ./configure --enable-rdma --disable-auth && make -j > (diod run, it runs rdma by default; not squashing as root fails with > rdma because of the ib_safe_file_access check: > [611503.258375] uverbs_write: process 1490213 (diod) changed security contexts after opening file descriptor, this is not allowed. > ) > $ sudo ./diod -f -e /tmp/linux-test/ --no-auth -U root -S > ``` > - guest side (with -net user) > ``` > # modprobe siw > # rdma link add siw0 type siw netdev eth0 > # mount -t 9p -o trans=rdma,aname=/tmp/linux-test <hostip> /mnt > ``` > > I've tested both the new and old mount api (with util-linux mount and > busybox mount) and it all seems in order to me; > as discussed in the other part of the thread we're now failing on > unknown options but I think that's a feature and we can change that if > someone complains. > > > As for "waiting for you," I assume that's more for your maintainer peers > > than for me? I'm not sure if this would go through Christian (cc'd) or > > through you? > > Sorry, I wasn't paying attention and confused you with another Eric > (Van Hensbergen) who is a 9p maintainer, so I was thinking you'd take > the patches, but that wasn't correct. > And that's after seeing your name all the time in #xfs, I'm sorry.. > > Christian is "just" a reviewer (for now!), and none of the other > maintainers pick much up lately, so I'll give this a second look and > take the patches. Fyi, Eric (Sandeen) is talking about me, Christian Brauner, whereas you seem to be thinking of Christian Schoenebeck...
