Re: [PATCH] exfat: drop redundant conversion to bool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> The result of integer comparison already evaluates to bool. No need for
>> explicit conversion.
>>
>> No functional impact.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   fs/exfat/inode.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/exfat/inode.c b/fs/exfat/inode.c
>> index c10844e1e16c..f9501c3a3666 100644
>> --- a/fs/exfat/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c
>> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int __exfat_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
>>          struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
>>          struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
>>          struct exfat_inode_info *ei = EXFAT_I(inode);
>> -       bool is_dir = (ei->type == TYPE_DIR) ? true : false;
>> +       bool is_dir = (ei->type == TYPE_DIR);
>>          struct timespec64 ts;
>>
>>          if (inode->i_ino == EXFAT_ROOT_INO)
> The following two if statements both check whether the directory is the root.
> Can we remove the second if statement? I don't know its background.
>
>          if (inode->i_ino == EXFAT_ROOT_INO)
>                  return 0;
>
>          if (is_dir && ei->dir.dir == sbi->root_dir && ei->entry == -1)
>                  return 0;

I agree with your view.

Best regards,





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux