Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:07:19 Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> >> Only flush extending writes (up to LLONG_MAX) for files with upcoming >> write operations, and Fix confusing 'end' parameter usage. > > Patch looks correct, but it changes behavior on input file of > copy_file_range(), which is not explained here. Thank you for your review. For the copy_file_range input file, since it only involves read operations, I think it is not necessary to flush to LLONG_MAX. Therefore, for the input file, flushing to the end is sufficient. If you think my understanding is correct, I can resend a revised version of the patch to update the commit log and include a clear explanation regarding the behavior changes in 'fuse_copy_file_range' and 'fuse_file_fallocate' operations. Thanks Chunsheng Luo
